Expiring Tax Credit Fails to Prevent 6th Consecutive Month of National Housing Price Declines. Chicago in Freefall.
Housing prices have fallen for 6 straight months since The Obama Housing Bubble collapsed in September. Price trends did improve slightly from February, driven by the expiring $8,000 tax credit, but overall results were dismal.

Since September California has been the only resilient region of the country. This is odd given that The Left Coast also remains the nation's most overvalued real estate. San Diego is the single Case-Shiller market not to have faltered since September 2009, and both it and San Francisco appreciated by 1.5% during March.
The Midwest has not fared so well. Chicago continues its freefall down 2.3% in March and 9.4% since September. Detroit declined by 4.1% from February.

- Los Angeles and San Diego are the most overvalued components of the index requiring a 40.7% and 38.6% decline from present levels to reach inflation-adjusted, pre-bubble price equilibrium
- The Case-Shiller 10 City Index needs to depreciate by another 31.6% to reach its inflation-adjusted, pre-bubble price equilibrium
- 6 markets have now fallen below inflation-adjusted 1997 price levels. Detroit would have to appreciate by 59.9% to return to its pre-bubble valuation
(Explanation of Methodology)

The only reason the national price collapse did not accelerate for an 8th straight month in March is that the expiring $8,000 tax credit created artificial demand. Now that the incentive is gone, demand will again disappear. April's housing price figures will be largely irrelevant as they capture the nadir of the homebuying distortion. It is the May index results which will provide a clean gauge of the housing market's health and indicate whether the summer home buying season will be a boom or bust. Given my expectation of a dramatic decline in artificial demand, I expect a bust.






Whitney, I live in Southern California. Inland markets led the fall here and have been decimated back to rental parity, or better. What are your ideas on why CA as a whole and/or LA/SD markets are slower on the descent to equilibrium? Some ideas I've read (dubious or otherwise): owners in wealthier markets have greater resources (savings) with which to hold out for a rebound (i.e. refusal to capitulate); SD/LA relative to inland areas represent a greater concentration of prime borrowers who were targeted later in sort of a 2nd 'wave'(via ARMs, HELOCs, etc.) only after the subprimes had been exhausted (i.e. the prime reset/recast shocks only just now hitting); the "its different/more-desirable here" rationalizations (i.e. same args made during the boom). My apologies if the question is too specific, regionally.
Reply to this
I also forgot to add that CA instituted a 'New Home/First Time Homebuyer' tax credit of 10k in 2009 and then extended it through 2010. I do not know whether other state revenue boards are running similar schemes.
Reply to this
Link to response.
Reply to this